Audit and diagnostics
We assess the current IT system and find weak points. The result is a modernisation project.
IT consulting
IT audit, strategy and a change roadmap for the organisation’s processes, data and procurement constraints.
Scope
What is included
IT strategy
We align IT development with the organisation’s goals for 1–3 years.
Investment assessment
We calculate benefits, risks and payback before the project starts.
Change roadmap
We prepare the technical specification, a roadmap and criteria for selecting technology and a contractor.
Typical requests
What should be automated first?We identify processes where manual work, duplicate data or delays create the highest operational risk.
Is a ready product enough?We compare organisational needs with UnityBase-based product capabilities and define where configuration, modules or integrations are needed.
Which integrations are critical?We describe data exchange between systems, registers, services, roles and access rights.
What are the risks before launch?We assess data migration, security, regulations, team workload and dependencies between stages.
Stages and outcomes
Discovery
Interviews and analysis of documents, roles, systems and data. Output — an as-is process map: bottlenecks, duplication, manual operations and risks.
Target architecture
We describe the target model around UnityBase. Output — solution architecture: Intecracy Group products, integrations, modules, access and data.
Solution assessment
We compare options by cost, timeline and risks. Output — a budget and risk assessment: scope, dependencies and launch scenarios.
Roadmap
We build a phased plan with priorities. Output — a technical specification: requirements, integrations, roles, acceptance criteria and support approach.
Preparing for change
Before Megapolis.DocNet implementation
To understand which document-oriented processes really need EDMS and which are part of broader automation.
Before system integration
When processes, data, registers, APIs and existing systems must be connected without chaotic point solutions.
Before module development
When there is a request for new functionality but it must be checked against configuration or ready product options.
why us
Why IQusion
Typical contractor
RiskTick-box auditA shallow review with no real dive into the agency’s processes and data.
Strategy in a vacuumRecommendations that ignore budget, regulations and procurement timelines.
A report that gathers dustA 100-page document with no clear action plan or priorities.
No accountability for resultsThey advise and leave; delivery is “not our scope”.
IQusion
RecommendedFact-based auditA survey of processes, systems and risks that pinpoints concrete bottlenecks.
Strategy tied to realityA roadmap that accounts for budget, security requirements and procurement order.
A prioritised action planClear steps by impact and complexity, not abstract advice.
We see it through to deliveryThe same contractor can implement the recommendations turnkey.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
We don’t sell a specific product disguised as an audit. First we map processes, data and risks, and only then propose an architecture — sometimes that means not deploying a new system at all.
A basic process-and-systems audit usually takes 1–3 weeks depending on the agency’s scale and the number of units involved.
A map of processes and systems, an assessment of risks and security requirements, and an implementation roadmap prioritised by impact and complexity.
No. The report and recommendations stand on their own; you can implement them with your own team or another contractor.
experience
Scenarios from our practice
Anonymised examples: what held the customer back, what we changed and the outcome. We do not tie them to specific clients due to NDA.
Systems grew chaotically
Problem
Information systems were added over years with no single strategy — duplication and opaque costs.
What we did
Ran an IT audit, assessed investments and built a change roadmap around real processes.
Result
A clear roadmap emerged and decisions are made on data.
Investment without rationale
Problem
Management had no objective view of which IT investments would pay off.
What we did
Assessed investments and prioritised initiatives by their impact on processes.
Result
Budget is directed at the highest-return projects.
Rollout stalled
Problem
Projects started without a clear plan and got stuck at approvals.
What we did
Built an IT strategy and a phased delivery plan with checkpoints.
Result
Projects move to plan and risks are visible in advance.
Related news
See all →
Process Automation
18.07.2025 · 3 min
System Integration
01.03.2024 · 2 min
Let’s discuss the task
Describe the task — we’ll propose an approach, integrations and timing. Need technical support?
Contact us →